New UN War Engagement Rules

Introduction

The Iraq war has shown those states with the veto (get out of jail card) power wield such influence in economic, military and political spheres globally. This dominant hold over the rest of the states in the world all those with the veto to subject their will (foreign policies) onto those without. We need new rules or the current rules to be updated and parts of it removed especially those relating to the veto. Unless the veto is removed and all states are respected equally within the UN with each vote having the same power as another, then unfortunately expect future conflict. Those states without veto power will be subjected to the whims of those with the veto, as sheep veto less states will be manipulated and culled by the wolves.

The Rules of Engagement

Before a sovereign state can submit its troops in a war against another sovereign state it must comply with the following conditions;

1. States with the power of the veto is relinquished.
2. Have 99% approval of all UN member states.
3. Statesmen, security, intelligence and military personnel supporting war against a sovereign state, group of people within a state are ordered to satisfy certain conditions.
4. These conditions are to engage the enemy in the front lines with their families beside them.
5. To continue the combat until they either succeed or fail in battle without the support of the army, air force, navy and intelligence services.
6. The result of the battle will determine the success or failure of either side.
7. Unless a sovereign state with its war ministries act in aggression towards another sovereign state by invasion or clearly identifiable hostile attacks, the defending state can engage in retaliation for a limited period (after which it would need to provide evidence to support its continued defensive measures alongside 99% UN member state support).
8. If statesmen are found guilty by a majority of the UN member states they will be convicted for war crimes and spend the rest of their lives in maximum security prisons.
9. Their assets including those of family relations will be seized by the state and distributed evenly to charities.
   
10. In a final act of shame those parties that played specific roles in the illegal acts of aggression, will have their names recorded in a register of evil (lesson for future warmongering, manipulative, corporate, megalomaniac, corrupt individuals). They can't avoid retribution, even if they commit suicide their families and relations will suffer, this aims to prevent potential illegal wars.

Finally

As in the Pharaoh times leaders names were removed from history as if they had never existed in order to punish them for eternity for their actions against the people. So will statesmen their names, families and relations will be removed from history so they no longer exist. Although they live in reality the cease to live in the peoples reality, all their records within the state and all their assets will be controlled by the people.

These measures albeit extreme will provide adequate measures in order to prevent future statesmen from plunging state(s) and regions into longterm generation conflicts, affecting generations mentally, physically and spiritually negatively. On a less serious note has anyone actually seen a veto ? is it a special card ? is it a special sign ? is it a special chair ? or is it just a private members club in which each state pays an annual subscription to ? any suggestions ?