Project Camelot Interviews

Introduction

Project Camelot are a husband and wife team investigating conspiracies, interviewing authors and participants. Courageous as it may seem, their endeavors to seek truth is recognised and appreciated by fellow seekers. Many of their interviews are intriguing, enthralling and liberating, unfortunately the passion for the truth sometimes blinds the quality of interviewees. Most of the interviewees seem reputable and have real truths in their stories, however others purport contentious theories and stories as fact without evidence. Evidence by means of academic qualifications, employment history in specific fields, detailed explanations using current scientific knowledge to explain and justify expressed statements and physical examples available for debate and investigation. Some of the interviewees provide little if any of these pieces of evidence that would enable the interviewer to cross-examine.

Glaring Anomaly



Dr Pete Peterson a recent contributor to Project Camelot alludes to many hypothesis's some of which he purports as fact. Stating facts without evidence to support them is just talk albeit entertaining in those dark lonely nights but misleading. We've know of people with an over stimulated imagination that can't differentiate between fantasy, dimensional reality and eternal consciousness. I'm not saying Pete is a nut, however his bouts of fractious behaviour during questioning seems incongruous. The irrefutable Dr. Pete Peterson should raise alarm for all of us are refutable as no one is perfect, what is his aim ? why speak now ? where is the evidence ? where are the detailed documentation ? Another theorist amalgamating numerous popular ideas into a super conspiracy theory with the aim to sound credible.

Finally

I enjoy listening to Project Camelot interviews and respect their determination and resolve in their quest for the truth. As with many of these "grass roots" organisations they are susceptible to infiltration and misinformation because it relies on the interviewee to be sound of mind. If Project Camelot continues to pursue similar "Dr Pete Peterson" type guests without the suggested evidence presented, then they might as well visit a local mental asylum, it might be more fun and drum (rhythmical and not satirical). As for guests like Pete i'll remain ambivalent it's better that way and avoid the foray.